I am sorry if you feel that paying $7.50 for an article is too much. The reason as to why we charge for an article is because we offer breaking news before any other publication in Nashville. We have a three-month trial subscription for just $19 if you would like to purchase that. It is only $11.50 more than a single article and you will have full access to our site as well as receive emails alerting you of breaking news.
Please let me know if I can help you.
624 Grassmere Park
Nashville, TN 37211
(615) 301-9228 (desk)
My Hours: Monday-Friday, 9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
From: email@example.com [firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:32 PM
Subject: NashvillePost.com Feedback from Elyssa Durant
I think it really sucks that I can’t read the article posted in account login and password. I have enough of those.
I wasted enough money at Vanderbilt. I should not have to pay $7.50 to read about someone else who feels the Powers That Beat are playing a sophisticated game of bait and switch.
Will someone please forward the text of this article to me online?
Thank you in advance!
Elyssa Durant, Ed.M.
Re: A Letter to the Editor: Are You Kidding Me? (littleplanet)
Posted: 9:04:18 pm on 5/9/2009 Modified: Never
here it is:
Claims to have been improperly expelled over honor code violation
Email | Print By Walker Duncan
02-03-2009 7:13 AM —
In an unusual but not unheard of turn of events, Vanderbilt University is facing a lawsuit from a former student over his expulsion.
The student, then a first-semester senior, who was expelled from the university for an alleged honor violation, has filed a lawsuit in Middle District Court over the conviction.
According to the lawsuit, in January of last year, the student was found guilty by the school’s honor council of having cheated on a physics exam the previous semester.
Of the 15 multiple-choice questions on the test, the student correctly answered two. However, the professor and the honor council pointed to the fact that student’s answers were identical to one of his classmates’ seated at the same table. That student, according to the complaint, was taking a different version of the test.
At the first honor council hearing, the student was found guilty by a vote of 10-2. Three not-guilty votes, the filing asserts would have necessitated a verdict of not guilty.
Upon appeal, the Vanderbilt Appellate Review Board reversed the conviction, saying that there were “procedural irregularities” during the first hearing. At a subsequent hearing last August, the student was again found guilty.
The lawsuit takes issue, however, with the fact that the new presiding officer in the second hearing was “fully aware of the results of the first hearing.”
Following the second hearing, the student was found guilty of an honor code charge, the result of which was a failing grade for the course and expulsion from the university.
Further details of the case can be found in the filing available at this link.
The student, in the filing, denies any wrongdoing and takes issue with the hearing process that led to his separation from Vanderbilt.
In addition to loss of future wages and other claims, the complaint also points out the more than $40,000 per year paid in tuition charges.
While no specific monetary damages are sought, the lawsuit claims damages both compensatory and punitive, loss of future earnings, etc. in an amount exceeding $75,000.
Reached by NashvillePost.com, Vanderbilt declined to comment on the case. Filing the lawsuit on behalf of the student is private practice attorney R. Scott Jackson.
There are currently 32767 members registered on Barbara Ehrenreich Forum.
Copyright © 2000-2002